In my opinion, the most prominent factor of designing something is that it should be complemented with the needs of the industry be it a gap or a solution to a problem.
While ID allows for time and cost savings, it is better to be complemented with real world case studies. While this works well for working adults taking on further studies, one of the suggested ways to allow foundation or 1st year students to understand is through story telling. Your thoughts on this.
In reply to DR. EDDIE LOH KOK HONG .
Re: Views on Instructional Design
I agree with Dr. Eddie. The id process that stresses what learners "need to know" while excluding nonessential content is considerably more effective and efficient, in addition to being centred on the learner. ID with a case study with a story-telling method prioritises necessary information in alignment with learning objectives to create engaging learning experiences that improve practical application while reducing cognitive load. This approach ultimately yields considerably higher numbers of successful and meaningful learning outcomes for the learners.
I completely agree with you—designing with the industry’s needs in mind is essential. Addressing real gaps or solving actual problems makes the design more impactful and relevant.