Because academics and HR professionals believe that major competitive advantage can be obtain trough developing, advancing, and managing people’s skills and intellectual assets. Strategic Human Resource Management is linking people management and development practice to be align with business strategies in order to achieve long-term management goals. It involve retraining, developing, placement and replacement of people, motivating, and retaining people. The SHRM was engage in planing and forming strategy in the ‘proactive’ orientation unlike HRM that supporting business strategy after the strategies are determine in business and organization level. SHRM was considered as importance part which benefit in developing employees skills and knowledge, develop relationship among the employees, and create workers bond and loyalty to the organization which result in benefit the organization to gain competitive advantage in long run.
In reply to THITA SAWAENGHA .
Re: Why have academics and HR professionals embraced SHRM?
by PASHCHENKO OLGA . -
I agree with your statement, as an effective Strategic Human Resource management will have a good impact on the company growth
In reply to THITA SAWAENGHA .
Re: Why have academics and HR professionals embraced SHRM?
by DAIKI WATANABE . -
Well explaind.
In reply to THITA SAWAENGHA .
Re: Why have academics and HR professionals embraced SHRM?
Agree with your point!
In reply to THITA SAWAENGHA .
Re: Why have academics and HR professionals embraced SHRM?
by EMAAN MALIK . -
I definitely agree with your points, especially in the end where you mention the gaining of long-run competitive advantage. I think it is quite interesting you mention that SHRM is more proactive than standard HRM; would you consider this as something HR managers would implement in their own self-interest even though it has clear benefits for organizations as a whole too?